Optimistic Concurrency Control

Table of contents

Introduction

Even though CrateDB does not support transactions, Optimistic Concurrency Control can be achieved by using the internal system columns _seq_no and _primary_term.

Every new primary shard row has an initial sequence number of 0. This value is increased by 1 on every insert, delete or update operation the primary shard executes. The primary term will be incremented when a shard is promoted to primary so the user can know if they are executing an update against the most up to date cluster configuration.

It’s possible to fetch the _seq_no and _primary_term by selecting them:

cr> SELECT id, type, _seq_no, _primary_term FROM sensors ORDER BY 1;
+-----+-------+---------+---------------+
| id  | type  | _seq_no | _primary_term |
+-----+-------+---------+---------------+
| ID1 | DHT11 |       0 |             1 |
| ID2 | DHT21 |       0 |             1 |
+-----+-------+---------+---------------+
SELECT 2 rows in set (... sec)

These _seq_no and _primary_term values can now be used on updates and deletes.

Note

Optimistic concurrency control only works using the = operator, checking for the exact _seq_no and _primary_term your update or delete is based on.

Optimistic update

Querying for the correct _seq_no and _primary_term ensures that no concurrent update and cluster configuration change has taken place:

cr> UPDATE sensors SET last_verification = '2020-01-10 09:40'
... WHERE
...   id = 'ID1'
...   AND "_seq_no" = 0
...   AND "_primary_term" = 1;
UPDATE OK, 1 row affected (... sec)

Updating a row with a wrong or outdated sequence number or primary term will not execute the update and results in 0 affected rows:

cr> UPDATE sensors SET last_verification = '2020-01-10 09:40'
... WHERE
...   id = 'ID1'
...   AND "_seq_no" = 42
...   AND "_primary_term" = 5;
UPDATE OK, 0 rows affected (... sec)

Optimistic delete

The same can be done when deleting a row:

cr> DELETE FROM sensors WHERE id = 'ID2'
...   AND "_seq_no" = 0
...   AND "_primary_term" = 1;
DELETE OK, 1 row affected (... sec)

Known limitations

  • The _seq_no and _primary_term columns can only be used when specifying the whole primary key in a query. For example, the query below is not possible with the database schema used for testing, because type is not declared as a primary key:

    cr> DELETE FROM sensors WHERE type = 'DHT11'
    ...   AND "_seq_no" = 3
    ...   AND "_primary_term" = 1;
    UnsupportedFeatureException["_seq_no" and "_primary_term" columns can only be used
    together in the WHERE clause with equals comparisons and if there are also equals
    comparisons on primary key columns]
    
  • In order to use the optimistic concurrency control mechanism, both the _seq_no and _primary_term columns need to be specified. It is not possible to only specify one of them. For example, the query below will result in an error:

    cr> DELETE FROM sensors WHERE id = 'ID1' AND "_seq_no" = 3;
    VersioningValidationException["_seq_no" and "_primary_term" columns can only be used
    together in the WHERE clause with equals comparisons and if there are also equals
    comparisons on primary key columns]
    
  • There is an exception to this behaviour, when the WHERE clause contains complex filtering and/or lots of Primary Key values. You can find more details here.

Note

Both DELETE and UPDATE commands will return a row count of 0, if the given required version does not match the actual version of the relevant row.